Eionet
Data Dictionary
This service is part of Reportnet
View schema
| Schema URL | http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/schemas/WFD2016/SWB_2016.xsd |
|---|---|
| File name | SWB_2016.xsd |
| Schema set | WFD2016 |
| Name | Surface Water Bodies Reporting 2016 schema |
There are 1 QA scripts and 0 conversion scripts registered for this schema.
Link to the schema page on XMLCONV
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<xs:schema targetNamespace="http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/schemas/WFD2016" xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns="http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/schemas/WFD2016" xmlns:wfd="http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/schemas/WFD2016/wfdcommon" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" elementFormDefault="qualified">
<xs:import namespace="http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/schemas/WFD2016/wfdcommon" schemaLocation="http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/schemas/WFD2016/WFDCommon_2016.xsd"/>
<xs:complexType name="SWB">
<xs:sequence>
<xs:element name="countryCode" type="wfd:CountryCode_Enum" minOccurs="1" maxOccurs="1">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation>Required. Two-letter ISO country code .</xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
</xs:element>
<xs:element name="euRBDCode" type="wfd:FeatureUniqueEUCodeType" minOccurs="1" maxOccurs="1">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation>Required. Unique EU code of the River Basin District. Prefix the RBD's national, unique code with the Member State's 2-alpha character ISO country code. Quality checks: Element check: First 2 characters must be the Member State's 2-alpha character ISO country code. Cross-schema check: The reported euRBDCode must be consistent with the codes reported in RBDSUCA/RBD/euRBDCode. </xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
</xs:element>
<xs:element name="SurfaceWaterBody" type="SurfaceWaterBody" minOccurs="1" maxOccurs="unbounded">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation>Table 2.2.3.2.</xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
</xs:element>
</xs:sequence>
<xs:attribute name="creationDate" use="required" type="wfd:DateType">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation>Required. Creation date of the file.</xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
</xs:attribute>
<xs:attribute name="creator" use="required" type="xs:string">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation>Required. Creator of the file.</xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
</xs:attribute>
<xs:attribute name="description" use="required" type="xs:string">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation>Required. Description of the file. </xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
</xs:attribute>
<xs:attribute name="email" use="required" type="xs:string">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation>Required. Contact email of data reporter. </xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
</xs:attribute>
<xs:attribute name="fileName" use="required" type="xs:string">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation>Required. Name of the file. </xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
</xs:attribute>
<xs:attribute name="generatedBy" use="required" type="xs:string">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation>Required. Name and/or organisation of data reporter. </xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
</xs:attribute>
<xs:attribute name="language" use="required" type="wfd:LanguageCode_Enum">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation>Required. Code of the language of the file.</xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
</xs:attribute>
</xs:complexType>
<xs:complexType name="QualityElement">
<xs:sequence>
<xs:element name="qeCode" type="wfd:StatusQE_Enum" minOccurs="1" maxOccurs="1">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation>Required. Select in turn each of the quality elements once and provide the associated information. Quality checks: Information for all quality elements should be provided. Each quality element should be chosen only once</xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
</xs:element>
<xs:element name="qeStatusOrPotentialValue" type="wfd:QEStatusCode_Enum" minOccurs="1" maxOccurs="1">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation>Required. Indicate the results of the assessment of this QE for all relevant surface water categories. '1' = High status or maximum potential. '2' = Good status or potential. '3' = Moderate status or potential (for QE1) or less than good status or potential (for QE2 and QE3). '4' = Poor status or potential (this option is only valid for quality elements starting with QE1). '5' = Bad status or potential (this option is only valid for quality elements starting with QE1). 'MonitoredButNotUsed' = Monitored but no standard has been developed and/or the QE is not used for status assessment (this option is only valid for quality elements starting with QE2 or QE3). 'Unknown' = Unknown status or potential. 'Not applicable' = Not applicable If there is no monitoring information for this QE and/or status is unknown then select ' Unknown' from the enumeration list. If the QE is not applicable in the surface water category or type then select option 'Not applicable' from the enumeration list. Quality checks: Within-schema check: if surfaceWaterCategory is 'TeW' then 'Not applicable' must be selected. If qeCode is any quality element starting with QE1, the option 'MonitoredButNotUsed' is not valid. If qeCode is any quality element starting with QE2 or QE3, the options '4' and '5' are not valid.</xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
</xs:element>
<xs:element name="qeMonitoringResults" type="wfd:MonitoringResults_Enum" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="1">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation>Conditional. If the status is reported, indicate on what basis the status classification was derived: 'Monitoring': means the QE was monitored in this surface water body and the results are used as a basis for classification. 'Grouping': the QE was not monitored in this surface water body. Monitoring from other similar water bodies was used as a basis for classification, as described in the methodology for classification. 'Expert judgement': the QE was not monitored in this surface water body. Results from other similar water bodies were not used. The QE status is mainly based on expert judgement. Quality checks: Conditional check: Report if element qeStatusOrPotentialValue is '1', '2', '3', '4' or '5' (i.e. not 'MonitoredButNotUsed', 'Unknown', 'Not applicable').</xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
</xs:element>
<xs:element name="qeMonitoringPeriod" type="wfd:YearRangeType" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="1">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation>Conditional. If the QE was monitored and the classification was derived from the monitoring data available, indicate the year/period of the monitoring data which was used in the classification. Quality checks: Conditional check: Report if qeMonitoringResults is 'Monitoring'.</xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
</xs:element>
<xs:element name="qeGrouping" type="wfd:FeatureUniqueEUCodeType" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation>Conditional. If no monitoring data is available for this surface water body and status has been derived through grouping by extrapolating monitoring data from other surface water bodies, indicate the codes of the surface water bodies which have been monitored and used in grouping. For example, if the status of surface water body A has been determined by extrapolating monitoring data from surface water bodies B and C, then the euSurfaceWaterBodyCode for surface water bodies B and C should be reported in this element. Quality checks: Conditional check: Report if qeMonitoringResults is 'Grouping'. Within-schema check: euSurfaceWaterBodyCode reported in qeGrouping must be consistent with codes reported in SWB/SWCharacterisation/euSurfaceWaterBodyCode. </xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
</xs:element>
<xs:element name="qeStatusOrPotentialChange" type="wfd:ValueQEX_StatusOrPotentialChange_Enum" minOccurs="1" maxOccurs="1">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation>Required. If the information is available and if there has been a change in classification since the first RBMP was reported, report that change. Otherwise, report ‘No information’. This covers all cases in which it is not possible to identify a change between 2010 and 2016, for example, new Water Bodies, for which there is no correspondence in the 2010 reporting or new reporting (as is the case for Norway): ’+2’ = Improvement by 2 or more classifications. ’+1’ = Improvement by 1 classification. ’0’ = No change of classification (select as the default). ‘-1’ = Deterioration by 1 classification. ‘-2’ = Deterioration by 2 or more classifications. ’Unknown2010’ = Status or potential was unknown in 2010. ‘No information’ = No information available and/or impossible to compare current status or potential with status or potential in 2010.</xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
</xs:element>
<xs:element name="qeStatusOrPotentialComparability" type="wfd:SoPComparability_Enum" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="1">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation>Conditional. If there has been a change in classification since the first RBMP was reported, indicate whether the reported change in status or potential is considered as being/due to: 'Consistent change' = A real change of status due to measures or due to increased/decreased pressures. 'Inconsistent due to changes to monitoring' = A significant change in monitoring (site, methodology) since the first RBMPs. 'Inconsistent due to changes to assessment methods' = A significant change in the assessment method since the first RBMPs. 'Inconsistent due to changes to monitoring and assessment methods' = A significant change in monitoring (site, methodology) and the assessment method since the first RBMPs. The default value to select should be 'Consistent change'. Quality checks Conditional check: Report if qeStatusOrPotentialChange is '+2', '+1', '-1' or '-2'.</xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
</xs:element>
<xs:element name="qeEcologicalExemptionType" type="wfd:ExemptionType_Enum" minOccurs="1" maxOccurs="unbounded">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation>Required. Report which type(s) of exemption(s) apply to this surface water body and QE. More than one exemption may apply. If surfaceWaterCategory is 'TeW' then 'No exemption' must be selected, which should be interpreted as 'Not applicable'. Quality check: Within-schema check: the option 'No exemption' is not compatible with any other. If surfaceWaterCategory is 'TeW' then 'No exemption' must be selected.</xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
</xs:element>
</xs:sequence>
</xs:complexType>
<xs:complexType name="SurfaceWaterBody">
<xs:sequence>
<xs:element name="euSurfaceWaterBodyCode" type="wfd:FeatureUniqueEUCodeType" minOccurs="1" maxOccurs="1">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation>Required. Unique EU code of the surface water body. Prefix the surface water body's national, unique code with the Member State's 2-alpha character ISO country code. Quality checks: Element check: EUSurfaceWaterBodyCode must be reported. String length must be within the range of 3 to 42 characters. First 2 characters must be the Member State's 2-alpha character ISO country code. Only one value can be reported. Within-schema check: euSurfaceWaterBodyCode must be unique.</xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
</xs:element>
<xs:element name="euSubUnitCode" type="wfd:FeatureUniqueEUCodeType" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="1">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation>Conditional. If the RBD has been divided into Sub-units, report the unique EU code of the Sub-unit where the water body is located. Prefix the Sub-unit's national, unique code with the Member State's 2-alpha character ISO country code18. Quality checks: Conditional. Report if sub-units are reported. Element check: String length must be a maximum of 42 characters. First 2 characters must be the Member State's 2-alpha character ISO country code. Only one value can be reported. Cross-schema check: The reported EUSubUnitCode must be consistent with the codes reported in RBDSUCA/RBD/SubUnit/euSubUnitCode.</xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
</xs:element>
<xs:element name="surfaceWaterBodyName" type="wfd:String250Type" minOccurs="1" maxOccurs="1">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation>Required. Readily understandable name of the surface water body in English that is meaningful outside of the RBD or Member State. It should include the name of the river, lake, transitional water, coastal water or territorial water in which the surface water body is located.</xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
</xs:element>
<xs:element name="surfaceWaterBodyCategory" type="wfd:SWCategoryCode_Enum" minOccurs="1" maxOccurs="1">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation>Required. Category of surface water body must be reported. 'RW' = River water body. 'LW' = Lake water body. 'TW' = Transitional water body. 'CW' = Coastal water body. 'TeW' = Territorial water body. Territorial waters are not a water body category under WFD. However, Article 2.1 of the WFD indicates that chemical status applies as well to territorial waters. This option allows Member States to report the relevant information for the part of territorial waters which extend beyond coastal waters. Non-relevant information such as water body type or ecological status does not need to be reported for territorial waters (see the guidance provided for these schema elements). It is the recommendation of this Guidance that reservoirs formed by damming rivers (i.e. heavily modified rivers) should be reported as river water bodies.See schema element Reservoirs below. </xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
</xs:element>
<xs:element name="naturalAWBHMWB" type="wfd:NaturalCode_Enum" minOccurs="1" maxOccurs="1">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation>Required. Indicate whether the surface water body is natural or artificial or heavily modified. Note: a water body cannot be both artificial and heavily modified. A reservoir may be artificial (e.g. constructed for bankside storage) or heavily modified (e.g. a dammed or impounded river). A canal may be artificial (e.g. specifically constructed for navigation where there was no surface water body before) or heavily modified (e.g. a river that has been deepened or widened or similarly engineered for navigation). The identification of the category for artificial water bodies (AWBs) or heavily modified water bodies (HMWBs) as described in the Category element does not preclude any decision regarding the factors to use in deriving typology and the quality elements to use in the assessment of the AWBs or HMWBs. According to the WFD Annex II, 1.1.v, the typology differentiation should be undertaken in accordance with the descriptors for whichever natural surface water category most closely resembles the AWB or HMWB concerned. Similarly, the quality elements should be those applicable to whichever natural surface water category most closely resembles the AWB or HMWB (WFD Annex V, 1.1.5). This means that reservoirs made by damming rivers may be categorised as heavily modified rivers but should be typified and assessed using the elements and tools for lakes, as lakes is the natural surface water category which reservoirs most closely resemble. The option "Natural" should be chosen for territorial waters. Quality checks: The option 'Natural' must be chosen if surfaceWaterBodyCategory is 'TeW'. </xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
</xs:element>
<xs:element name="hmwbWaterUse" type="wfd:HMWBWaterUse_Enum" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation>Conditional. For HMWBs only, report the water use for which it has been designated. 'Wider environment' can refer to designation in order to maintain nature protected areas and also archaeological sites and patrimony (see CIS Guidance Document No. 4 – Identification and Designation of Heavily Modified and Artificial Water Bodies ). Quality checks: Conditional check: Report if naturalAWBHMWB is 'Heavily Modified'.</xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
</xs:element>
<xs:element name="hmwbPhysicalAlteration" type="wfd:HMWBPhysicalAlteration_Enum" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation>Conditional. For HMWBs only, report the physical alteration that has resulted in the designation of the surface water body as a HMWB. In the context of designation, physical alterations mean any significant alterations that have resulted in substantial changes to the hydromorphology of a surface water body such that the surface water body is substantially changed in character. In general, these hydromorphological characteristics are long-term and alter both the morphological and hydrological characteristics. Further guidance on the terms is found in the Glossary section below. Quality checks: Conditional check: Report if naturalAWBHMWB is 'Heavily Modified'.</xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
</xs:element>
<xs:element name="reservoir" type="wfd:YesNoUnclearReservoir_Enum" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="1">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation>Conditional. For heavily modified river or lake water bodies, indicate whether the water body is a reservoir that has been created by damming a river ('Yes, it is a reservoir and the water body was originally a river') or an existing lake ('No, it is a reservoir but the water body was originally a lake'). It is the recommendation of this Guidance that reservoirs formed by damming rivers should be reported as heavily modified river water bodies.However, Member States may choose to report reservoirs formed by damming rivers as lake water bodies if they wish. The 'reservoir' schema element must be reported so that Member States can clarify the designation. 'Yes, it is a reservoir and the water body was originally a river' = Select only if the whole surface water body represents a reservoir (or part of a reservoir) created by damming a river. (surfaceWaterBodyCategory must be reported as 'RW' and naturalAWBHMWB as 'Heavily Modified'). 'No, it is a reservoir but the water body was originally a lake' = Select if the whole surface water body represents a reservoir (or part of a reservoir) created by modifying an existing lake, or if the surface water body includes some small reservoirs which are not significant enough to be identified as separate surface water bodies. (surfaceWaterBodyCategory must be reported as 'LW' and naturalAWBHMWB as 'Heavily Modified'). 'Unclear, it is a reservoir but originally included chained rivers and lakes' = Select in such cases where the reservoir has been created by damming a water body which contained chained rivers and lakes. (surfaceWaterBodyCategory must be reported as 'RW' or 'LW' and naturalAWBHMWB as 'Heavily Modified'). 'The water body is not a reservoir' = Indicates that the river or lake water body is not a reservoir. Quality checks: Conditional check: Report if surfaceWaterBodyCategory is 'RW' or 'LW' AND naturalHeavilyModified is 'Heavily Modified'.</xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
</xs:element>
<xs:element name="surfaceWaterBodyTypeCode" type="wfd:String100Type" minOccurs="1" maxOccurs="1">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation>Required. Member State code for the characterisation type of the surface water body, as reported in the surface water methodology schema (SWMET), and the RBMP and background documents. Report 'Not applicable' for territorial waters. Quality checks: Within-schema check: 'Not applicable' should be reported only if surfaceWaterBodyCategory is 'TeW'. Cross-schema check: The reported surfaceWaterBodyTypeCode must be consistent with the codes reported in SWMET/SWType/swTypeCode.</xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
</xs:element>
<xs:element name="surfaceWaterBodyIntercalibrationType" type="wfd:SWIntercalibrationType_Enum" minOccurs="1" maxOccurs="unbounded">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation>Required. If the surface water body type corresponds with an intercalibration type, report the intercalibration type code (not name). The intercalibration type reported in this element must be appropriate to the surface water body's Category. If there is no corresponding intercalibration type, select 'Not applicable'. Report 'Not applicable' for territorial waters. Quality checks: Within-schema check: 'Not applicable' should be reported if SurfaceWaterBodyCategory is 'TeW'. Cross-schema check: SurfaceWaterBodyIntercalibrationType must be consistent with the codes reported in SWMET/IntercalibrationType</xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
</xs:element>
<xs:element name="surfaceWaterBodyTransboundary" type="wfd:YesNoNotApplicable_Union_Enum" minOccurs="1" maxOccurs="1">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation>Required. The Directive requires coordination among Member States for the management of transboundary Water Bodies. Transboundary water bodies are those crossing the border between countries or constituting part of the border between two countries for a certain length. For reporting purposes in the case of water bodies that cross the border between countries, and for the sake of clarity, each Member State should report on its own part of these trans-boundary Water Bodies. Geographic information should therefore be provided for the part of the Water Body within the reporting Member State and likewise for all elements which have a clear geographical reference (e.g. size, monitoring stations). Each Member State should also report on all elements that apply to the whole water body (status, pressures, etc). For the latter the Commission expects that the information provided by each of the Member States concerned will be identical, as a result of the coordinated management required by the Directive. Similarly, for water bodies which constitute part of the border between two countries the same principles apply. In the case of rivers represented as lines, the same line will have to be reported by both Member States concerned, instead of reporting different but adjacent areas, as is the case, for example, for a lake that extends across the border. Not applicable for territorial waters. Quality checks: Within-schema check: 'Not applicable' should be reported if SurfaceWaterBodyCategory is 'TeW'.</xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
</xs:element>
<xs:element name="swAssociatedProtectedArea" type="wfd:YesNoCode_Enum" minOccurs="1" maxOccurs="1">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation>Required. Indicate whether the surface water body is associated to any protected area.</xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
</xs:element>
<xs:element name="swSignificantPressureType" type="wfd:SignificantPressureType_Enum" minOccurs="1" maxOccurs="unbounded">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation>Required. Indicate the significant pressure type(s) from the enumeration list. If a combination of pressure-driver is not significant on its own but it is in combination with others, select all the relevant pressures of that type that are present which make the overall pressure significant (e.g. if abstraction from industry or agriculture is not relevant on their own but they are relevant in combination, select both). If the ecological status or potential of the surface water body is less than good, at least one significant pressure type must be reported. The option 'No significant pressure' is not valid. If the chemical status of the surface water body is less than good, at least one significant pressure type must be reported. The option 'No significant pressure' is not valid. Quality checks: Within-schema check: the option 'No significant pressure' is not compatible with any other. Within-schema check: the option 'Not applicable' is not compatible with any other option and can be selected if and only if surfaceWaterBodyCategory is 'TeW' (not compatible with any other surfaceWaterBodyCategory). Within-schema check: If SWB/SurfaceWaterBody/swEcologicalStatusOrPotentialValue is '3', '4' or '5', at least one significant pressure type must be selected from the enumeration list (can include option '8 Unknown pressures'). The option 'No significant pressure' is not a valid selection. Within-schema check: If SWB/SurfaceWaterBody/swChemicalStatusValue is '3', at least one significant pressure type must be selected from the enumeration list (can include '8 Unknown pressures'). The option 'No significant pressure' is not a valid selection.</xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
</xs:element>
<xs:element name="swSignificantPressureOther" type="wfd:String1000Type" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="1">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation>Conditional. If '7 – Anthropogenic pressure – Other' is selected from the enumeration list and reported under swSignificantPressureType, provide details of any other anthropogenic pressure types which are relevant in this element. This element should only be reported if the pressure type is not included in the enumeration list under swSignificantPressureType. Quality checks: Conditional check: Report if '7 – Anthropogenic pressure – Other' is selected from the enumeration list under swSignificantPressureType.</xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
</xs:element>
<xs:element name="swSignificantImpactType" type="wfd:SignificantImpactType_Enum" minOccurs="1" maxOccurs="unbounded">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation>Required. Indicate the impact type(s) from the enumeration list. If the ecological status or potential of the surface water body is less than good, at least one significant impact type or the option 'UNKN - Unknown impact type' must be reported. The option 'NOSI - No significant impact' is not valid. If the chemical status of the surface water body is less than good, at least one significant impact type or the option 'UNKN - Unknown impact type' must be reported. The option 'NOSI - No significant impact' is not valid. Quality checks: Within-schema check: the option 'NOSI - No significant impact' is not compatible with any other. Within-schema check: the option 'NOTA - Not applicable' is not compatible with any other option and must be selected if and only if surfaceWaterBodyCategory is 'TeW' (not compatible with any other surfaceWaterBodyCategory). Within-schema check: If SWB/SWEcologicalStatus/SwEcologicalStatusOrPotentialValue is '3', '4' or '5', at least one significant impact type or the option 'UNKN - Unknown impact type' must be selected from the enumeration list . The option 'NOSI - No significant impact' is not a valid selection. Within-schema check: If SWB/SurfaceWaterBody/swChemicalStatusValue is '3', at least one significant impact type or the option 'UNKN - Unknown impact type' must be selected from the enumeration list. The option 'NOSI - No significant impact' is not a valid selection.</xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
</xs:element>
<xs:element name="swSignificantImpactOther" type="wfd:String1000Type" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="1">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation>Conditional. If 'OTHE - Other significant impact type' is selected from the enumeration list under swSignificantImpactType, provide details of any other impact types which are relevant in this element. This element should only be reported if the impact type is not included in the enumeration list under swSignificantImpactType. Quality checks: Conditional check: Report if 'OTHE - Other significant impact type' is selected from the enumeration list under swSignificantImpactType</xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
</xs:element>
<xs:element name="swEcologicalStatusOrPotentialValue" type="wfd:EcologicalStatusCode_Enum" minOccurs="1" maxOccurs="1">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation>Required. Indicate the ecological status or potential of the surface water body, based on the most recently assessed status of the surface water body. '1' = High status or maximum potential. '2' = Good status or potential. '3' = Moderate status or potential. '4' = Poor status or potential. '5' = Bad status or potential. 'Unknown' = Unknown status or potential. 'Not applicable' = Not applicable (for territorial waters only). Quality checks: Within-schema check: if surfaceWaterBodyCategory is 'TeW' then 'Not applicable' must be selected.</xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
</xs:element>
<xs:element name="swEcologicalAssessmentYear" type="wfd:YearRangeType" minOccurs="1" maxOccurs="1">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation>Required. Provide the year on which the assessment of status is based. This may be the year that the surface water body was monitored. In case of grouping this may be the year in which monitoring took place in the surface water bodies within a group that are used to extrapolate results to non-monitored surface water bodies within the same group. A period is possible (e.g. 2011--2013).</xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
</xs:element>
<xs:element name="swEcologicalAssessmentConfidence" type="wfd:Confidence_Enum" minOccurs="1" maxOccurs="1">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation>Required. Indicate the confidence on the chemical status assigned. '0' = No information. '1' = Low confidence. '2' = Medium confidence. '3' = High confidence. The criteria used by Member States to assess confidence vary considerably, but general guidance may be: Low = no monitoring data; Medium = limited or insufficiently robust monitoring data for some or all Priority Substances that are discharged in the RBD; High = good data for all Priority Substances that are discharged in the RBD.</xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
</xs:element>
<xs:element name="swEcologicalStatusOrPotentialExpectedGoodIn2015" type="wfd:YesNoNotApplicable_Union_Enum" minOccurs="1" maxOccurs="1">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation>Required. Indicate whether it is expected that this surface water body will achieve good (or better) ecological status or potential by the end of 2015. This may differ from the data reported under swEcologicalStatusOrPotentialValue because the assessment of status included in the second RBMP will most likely be based on monitoring data from the period 2010-2014, given that the second RBMP will be prepared in 2014 for public consultation. Therefore, the status communicated in the second RBMP may not necessarily reflect the expected status in 2015. The methodology of this assessment should be clearly explained in the RBMP or background documents (reference reported under classification methodologies (see Section 7.3)). If an Article 4(4) or 4(5) exemption for ecological status is applied then 'No' should be selected. 'Not applicable' is only valid in case SurfaceWaterCategory is 'TeW'. Quality checks: Within-schema check: If swEcologicalExemptionType is 'Article 4(4)…' or 'Article 4(5)…' , the option 'No' must be selected from the enumeration list. All other options are not valid selections. Within-schema check: if surfaceWaterBodyCategory is 'TeW' then 'Not applicable' must be selected.</xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
</xs:element>
<xs:element name="swEcologicalStatusOrPotentialExpectedAchievementDate" type="wfd:GoodStatus_Enum" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="1">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation>Conditional. If good ecological status or potential will NOT be achieved by 2015 (swEcologicalStatusOrPotentialExpectedGoodIn2015 is No), report the date by which it is expected that it will be achieved in full. The methodology of this assessment should be clearly explained in the RBMP or background documents (reference reported under classification methodologies). If good ecological status or potential will not be achieved by 2015, exemptions should be applied. Please report the date by which it is expected that good ecological status or potential will be achieved in full, not the date relating to individual exemptions. However, please note the following: Article 4(4) exemptions relate to the extension of deadlines. According to Article 4(4)c of the WFD, postponing the achievement of objectives beyond 2027 is only possible due to natural conditions. If Article 4(5) exemptions apply, report the date by when the less stringent objective is to be achieved. If the less stringent objective has already been achieved then select 'Less stringent objectives already achieved'. If good ecological status or potential will be achived by 2015 (swEcologicalStatusOrPotentialExpectedGoodIn2015 is Yes) this element should not be reported. This element should not be reported if surfaceWaterBodyCategory is 'TeW' (territorial waters). Quality checks: Conditional check: Report if swEcologicalStatusOrPotentialExpectedGoodIn2015 is 'No'. Within-schema check: 'Less stringent objectives already achieved' is only a valid entry if 'Article 4(5)…' is reported under swEcologicalExemptionType.</xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
</xs:element>
<xs:element name="swChemicalStatusValue" type="wfd:StatusCode_Enum" minOccurs="1" maxOccurs="1">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation>Required. Indicate the chemical status of the water body. '2' = Good status. '3' = Poor status. 'Unknown' = Unknown status. With the exception of the AA-EQS for naphthalene in transitional waters, coastal waters and territorial waters, this should be based on the standards laid down in EQS Directive 2008/105/EC (version in force on 13 January 2009). </xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
</xs:element>
<xs:element name="swChemicalAssessmentYear" type="wfd:YearRangeType" minOccurs="1" maxOccurs="1">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation>Required. Provide the year on which the assessment of status is based. This may be the year that the surface water body was monitored. In case of grouping this may be the year in which monitoring took place in the surface water bodies within a group that are used to extrapolate results to non-monitored surface water bodies within the same group. A period is possible (e.g. 2011-2013).</xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
</xs:element>
<xs:element name="swChemicalAssessmentConfidence" type="wfd:Confidence_Enum" minOccurs="1" maxOccurs="1">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation>Required. Indicate the confidence on the chemical status assigned. ‘0’ = No information. ‘1’ = Low confidence. ‘2’ = Medium confidence. ‘3’ = High confidence. The criteria used by Member States to assess confidence vary considerably, but general guidance may be: Low = no monitoring data; Medium = limited or insufficiently robust monitoring data for some or all Priority Substances that are discharged in the RBD; High = good data for all Priority Substances that are discharged in the RBD.</xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
</xs:element>
<xs:element name="swChemicalMonitoringResults" type="wfd:MonitoringResults_Enum" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="1">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation>Conditional. Indicate on what basis the status classification was derived: 'Monitoring': there is monitoring data available from this water body and this is used for classfication. 'Grouping': there is no monitoring data available from this water body. Monitoring from other similar water bodies was used as a basis for classification, as described in the methodology for classification. 'Expert judgement': there is no monitoring data available in this surface water body. Results from other similar water bodies were not used. The status is mainly based on expert judgement. Quality checks: Quality checks: Conditional check: Report if element swChemicalStatusValue is '2' or '3' (i.e. not 'Unknown').</xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
</xs:element>
<xs:element name="swChemicalStatusGrouping" type="wfd:FeatureUniqueEUCodeType" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation>Conditional. If no monitoring data is available for this surface water body and status has been derived through grouping by extrapolating monitoring data from other surface water bodies, indicate the codes of the surface water bodies which have been monitored and used in grouping. For example if the status of surface water body A has been determined by extrapolating monitoring data from surface water bodies B and C, then the euSurfaceWaterBodyCode for surface water bodies B and C should be reported in this element. Quality checks: Conditional check: Report if swChemicalMonitoringResults is 'Grouping'. Within-schema check: euSurfaceWaterBodyCode reported in swChemicalStatusGrouping must be consistent with codes reported in SWB/SurfaceWaterBody/euSurfaceWaterBodyCode.</xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
</xs:element>
<xs:element name="swChemicalStatusExpectedGoodIn2015" type="wfd:YesNoCode_Enum" minOccurs="1" maxOccurs="1">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation>Required. Indicate whether it is expected that this surface water body will achieve good chemical status by the end of 2015. This may differ from the data reported under swChemicalStatusValue because the assessment of status included in the second RBMP will most likely be based on monitoring data from the period 2010-2014, given that the second RBMP will be prepared in 2014 for public consultation. Therefore, the status communicated in the second RBMP may not necessarily reflect the expected status in 2015. The methodology of this assessment should be clearly explained in the RBMP or background documents (reference reported under classification methodologies (see Section 7.4)). If an Article 4(4) or 4(5) exemption for chemical status is applied then 'No' should be selected. Quality checks: Within-schema check: If swChemicalExemptionType for any of the substances reported as exceeding is 'Article 4(4)…' or 'Article 4(5)…' , the option 'No' must be selected from the enumeration list.</xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
</xs:element>
<xs:element name="swChemicalStatusExpectedAchievementDate" type="wfd:GoodStatus_Enum" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="1">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation>Conditional. If good chemical status will NOT be achieved by 2015 (swChemicalStatusExpectedGoodIn2015 is No), report the date by which it is expected that it will be achieved in full. The methodology of this assessment should be clearly explained in the RBMP or background documents (reference reported under classification methodologies). If good chemical status will not be achieved by 2015, exemptions should be applied. Please report the date by which it is expected that good chemical status will be achieved in full, not the date relating to individual exemptions. However, please note the following: Article 4(4) exemptions relate to the extension of deadlines. According to Article 4(4)c of the WFD, postponing the achievement of objectives beyond two further updates of the river basin management plan is only possible due to natural conditions. If Article 4(5) exemptions apply, report the date by when the less stringent objective is to be achieved. If the less stringent objective has already been achieved then select 'Less stringent objectives already achieved'. If good chemical status will be achieved by 2015 (swChemicalStatusExpectedGoodIn2015 is Yes) this element should not be reported. Quality checks: Quality checks: Conditional check: Report if swChemicalStatusExpectedGoodIn2015 is 'No'. Within-schema check: 'Less stringent objectives already achieved' is only a valid entry if 'Article 4(5)…' is reported under swChemicalExemptionType.</xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
</xs:element>
<xs:element name="swMixingZones" type="wfd:YesNoCode_Enum" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="1">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation>Optional. Report whether Mixing Zones have been designated in the surface water body.</xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
</xs:element>
<xs:element name="swMixingZonesProportion" type="wfd:NumberPercentageType" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="1">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation>Optional. Report the percentage of length or area of the surface water body that has been designated as a Mixing Zone.</xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
</xs:element>
<xs:element name="SWEcologicalExemptionType" type="SWEcologicalExemptionType" minOccurs="1" maxOccurs="unbounded"/>
<xs:element name="QualityElement" type="QualityElement" minOccurs="19" maxOccurs="19">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation>For each QE, the following information should be reported. The default status or potential value in all cases should be reported as ‘U’ (Unknown). The information should be reported for all surface water categories. For the purposes of this document, the description of the information to report for each QE is included in the following table for QE11Phytoplankton only. For the rest only the first element is included in the table below (the element qexStatusOrPotentialValue). However the associated elements (qexMonitoringPeriod, qexGrouping, qexStatusOrPotentialChange, qexStatusOrPotentialComparability and qexEcologicalExemptionType) should be reported for each QE. In terms of description of the schema elements, replace QEx with QE12OtherAquaticFlora etc.</xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
</xs:element>
<xs:element name="SWAssociatedProtectedArea" type="SWAssociatedProtectedArea" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"/>
<xs:element name="SWPrioritySubstance" type="SWPrioritySubstance" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"/>
<xs:element name="FailingRBSP" type="FailingRBSP" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"/>
</xs:sequence>
</xs:complexType>
<xs:complexType name="SWEcologicalExemptionType">
<xs:sequence>
<xs:element name="swEcologicalExemptionType" type="wfd:ExemptionType_Enum" minOccurs="1" maxOccurs="1">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation>Required. Report which type(s) of exemption(s) apply if good ecological status or potential is not expected to be achieved by 2015. More than one exemption may apply to a surface water body. In case surfaceWaterCategory is 'TeW', 'No exemption' should be reported and interpreted as 'Not applicable'. Quality checks: Within-schema check: 'No exemption' is not compatible with any other option. Within-schema check: If swEcologicalStatusOrPotentialExpectedGoodIn2015 is 'No' then the option 'No exemption' is not possible. One or more of the other options must be selected. Within-schema check: if surfaceWaterCategory is 'TeW' then 'No exemption' must be selected.</xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
</xs:element>
<xs:element name="swEcologicalExemptionPressure" type="wfd:SignificantPressureType_Enum" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation>Conditional. If any Article 4(4), Article 4(5) and/or Article 4(7) exemptions apply to this surface water body for ecological status, report the significant pressure(s) that are causing failure in order to justify the exemption(s). Quality checks: Conditional check: If swEcologicalExemptionType is not 'No exemption', at least one significant pressure type must be selected from the enumeration list (the options 'No significant pressure' and 'Not applicable' are not valid).</xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
</xs:element>
</xs:sequence>
</xs:complexType>
<xs:complexType name="SWPrioritySubstance">
<xs:sequence>
<xs:element name="swPrioritySubstanceCode" type="wfd:PS_Enum" minOccurs="1" maxOccurs="1">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation>Required . Select each priority substance for which one or more of the following circumstances occur in the relevant water body: - The substance is causing failure of chemical status due to exceedance of the relevant EQS (element swPrioritySubstanceCausingFailure and swPrioritySubstanceExceedanceType) - The priority substance has improved from poor to good chemical status since the first RBMP (element swPrioritySubstanceImprovingChemicalStatus) - The more stringent EQSs adopted in Directive 2013/39/EU caused the status of the surface water body to appear to deteriorate (element swPrioritySubstanceEffectStatusNewThresholds) - The priority substance exceeds or is expected to exceed the EQS within the mixing zone (optional element swPrioritySubstanceExceedanceInMixingZone)</xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
</xs:element>
<xs:element name="swPrioritySubstanceCausingFailure" type="wfd:YesNoCode_Enum" minOccurs="1" maxOccurs="1">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation>Required. Indicate if the priority substance is causing failure to achieve good chemical status. Information on exceedances from ubiquitous substances should be reported. For substances for which EQS were made more stringent in the 2013 amendment of the EQS Directive (Anthracene, Brominated diphenylethers, Fluoranthene, Lead and its compounds, Naphthalene, Nickel and its compounds and Polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAH)), exceedances of either the 2008 EQS or the 2013 EQS, or both, should be reported here. Exceedances of the latter should be reported even when swChemicalStatusValue is good on the basis of the less stringent 2008 standards, in order to enable the reporting of swChemicalExceedancesType and, if appropriate, of swChemicalExemptionType and swChemicalExemptionPressure. The substances causing exceedances to the 2013 EQSs but not to the 2008 EQSs should also be reported under schema element swEffectStatusNewThresholds. See table at the end of this section of the guidance on different scenarios for these substances and the corresponding reporting values. Quality checks: If swChemicalStatusValue is '3', at least 1 substance should be reported as 'Yes' in swPrioritySubstanceCausingFailure. The substances reported under swEffectStatusNewThresholds must be reported here as exceedances. </xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
</xs:element>
<xs:element name="swPrioritySubstanceExceedanceType" type="wfd:SWPrioritySubstanceExceedanceType_Enum" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="1">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation>Conditional. For each Priority Substance exceeding EQS, indicate which EQS is exceeded. 'AA EQS' = Annual Average of the EQS. 'MAC EQS' = Maximum Allowable Concentration of the EQS. 'Both' = Both.Quality checks: Conditional check: report if 'swPrioritySubstanceCausingFailure' is 'Yes'</xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
</xs:element>
<xs:element name="swPrioritySubstanceImprovingChemicalStatus" type="wfd:YesNoCode_Enum" minOccurs="1" maxOccurs="1">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation>Required. Report whether the Priority Substance improved from poor to good chemical status since the first RBMP. For the Priority Substances for which the EQSs have changed in the 2013 amendment of the EQS Directive (2013/39/EU), the improvement should refer to the 2008 EQS.</xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
</xs:element>
<xs:element name="swPrioritySubstanceEffectStatusNewThresholds" type="wfd:YesNoNotApplicable_Union_Enum" minOccurs="1" maxOccurs="1">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation>Required. If the priority substance is one of the seven for which more stringent EQSs were adopted in Directive 2013/39/EU, indicate if the new standard caused the status of the surface water body to appear to deteriorate. If not one of the seven report 'Not applicable'. The assessment of failure according to the new, more stringent standards is relevant for the purpose of meeting the 2021 good chemical status objective as set in Article 3 paragraph 1a(i) of EQS Directive 2008/105/EC as amended by Directive 2013/39/EU. Quality checks: The options 'Yes' and 'No' are only valid for the following seven priority substances: Anthracene, Brominated diphenylethers, Fluoranthene, Lead and its compounds, Naphthalene, Nickel and its compounds, Polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAH). For all other priority substances the option 'Not applicable' must be reported. </xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
</xs:element>
<xs:element name="swPrioritySubstanceExceedanceInMixingZone" type="wfd:YesNoCode_Enum" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="1">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation>Optional. Report whether the Priority Substance exceeds or is expected to exceed the EQS within the Mixing Zone in the surface water body.Quality checks: Reporting is possible only if 'swMixingZones' is 'Yes'</xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
</xs:element>
<xs:element name="SWChemicalExemptionType" type="SWChemicalExemptionType" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"/>
</xs:sequence>
</xs:complexType>
<xs:complexType name="SWChemicalExemptionType">
<xs:sequence>
<xs:element name="swChemicalExemptionType" type="wfd:ExemptionType_Enum" minOccurs="1" maxOccurs="1">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation>Required. Report which type(s) of exemption(s) apply if good chemical status is not expected to be achieved by 2015 for that priority substance. If there are exceedances of the EQSs made more stringent in 2013 (for substances Anthracene, Brominated diphenylethers, Fluoranthene, Lead and its compounds, Naphthalene, Nickel and its compounds and Polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAH)), report which type(s) of exemption(s) apply if good chemical status is not expected to be achieved by 2021. More than one exemption may apply to a surface water body. Article 4(6) exemptions can also be reported if relevant for chemical status (e.g. accidents). Article 4(7) exemptions are not relevant for good chemical status and therefore cannot be reported. Quality checks: Within-schema check: The option 'No exemption' is not compatible with any other. Therefore, if reported, no more instances of 'swChemicalExemptionType' should be reported. The options 'Article4(7) - New modification' and 'Article4(7) - Sustainable human development' are not valid for chemical status and therefore cannot be reported.</xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
</xs:element>
<xs:element name="swChemicalExemptionPressure" type="wfd:SignificantPressureType_Enum" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation>Conditional. If any Article 4(4) or 4(5) exemptions apply to this surface water body for chemical status, report the significant pressure(s) that are causing failure in order to justify the exemption(s). Quality checks: Conditional check: If swChemicalExemptionType is not 'No exemption', at least one significant pressure type must be selected from the enumeration list. The options 'No significant pressure' and 'Not applicable' are not valid.</xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
</xs:element>
</xs:sequence>
</xs:complexType>
<xs:complexType name="SWAssociatedProtectedArea">
<xs:sequence>
<xs:element name="euProtectedAreaCode" type="wfd:ProtectedAreaCodeType" minOccurs="1" maxOccurs="1">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation>Required . Unique EU code(s) of the (water-dependent) Protected Area(s) associated to the surface water body. If applicable, report the code of the Protected Area as previously reported under other directives. If it has not been reported under other Directive, report the code reported under the GML schema ProtectedAreas (see Annex 5 GIS guidance). If not already included in the first two characters of the code when reported under other directives, prefix the unique code with the Member State’s 2-alpha character ISO country code. Quality checks: Element check: First 2 characters must be the Member State’s 2-alpha character ISO country code. Cross-schema check: the reported euProtectedAreaCode must be consistent with the codes reported in ProtectedArea/thematicIdIdentifier. </xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
</xs:element>
<xs:element name="protectedAreaType" type="wfd:ProtectedAreaType_Enum" minOccurs="1" maxOccurs="1">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation>Required. Report the type for each Protected Area related to the surface water body. If the Member State applies a 'whole territory' approach for Urban Waste Water Treatment and/or Nitrates Directive, surface water bodies should not be reported as Protected Areas.</xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
</xs:element>
<xs:element name="protectedAreaOtherType" type="wfd:String250Type" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation>Conditional. If the type of Protected Area is reported as 'Other', provide more information. Quality checks: Conditional check: Report if 'protectedAreaType' is 'Other'.</xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
</xs:element>
<xs:element name="protectedAreaAssociationType" type="wfd:ProtAreaAssociationType_Enum" minOccurs="1" maxOccurs="1">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation>Required. Report the type of association that the surface water body has with the Protected Area. The boundaries of surface water bodies and Protected Areas will not always directly coincide with each other. 'Within Protected Area' = The surface water body is located entirely within the Protected Area. The Protected Area may be associated with more than one surface water body. 'Overlapping / partly within Protected Area' = The surface water body overlaps or is located partly within the Protected Area, or overlaps more than one Protected Area. 'Dynamically / hydrologically connected with Protected Area' = The surface water body is dynamically or hydrologically connected with the Protected Area without being located entirely or partly within it.</xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
</xs:element>
<xs:element name="protectedAreaHabitatsBirdsObjectivesSet" type="wfd:ProtectedAreaHabitatsBirdsObjective_Enum" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="1">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation>Conditional. Indicate whether specific water objectives have been set to protect relevant water dependent protected habitats and species by selecting the appropriate option from the enumeration list. Quality checks: Element check: A valid option must be selected from the enumeration list. Only one option can be selected. Conditional check: Report if 'protectedAreaType' is 'Habitats' or 'Birds'.</xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
</xs:element>
<xs:element name="protectedAreaHabitatsBirdsObjectivesMet" type="wfd:YesNoNoInformation_Union_Enum" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="1">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation>Conditional. Indicate whether the objectives set to protect water dependent habitats and species in Habitats and Birds Protected Areas are met: 'Yes': the specific water objectives set to protect water dependent habitats and species are met. 'No': the specific water objectives set to protect water dependent habitats and species are not yet met. 'No information' Quality checks: Conditional check: Report if protectedAreaType is 'Habitats' or 'Birds' AND protectedAreaHabitatsBirdsObjectivesSet is either of the two 'Yes…' options.</xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
</xs:element>
<xs:element name="protectedAreaDrinkingWaterObjectivesSet" type="wfd:YesNoCode_Enum" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="1">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation>Conditional. Indicate whether additional, specific standards have been set to protect drinking water by selecting the appropriate option from the enumeration list: 'Yes': specific standards have been set in the surface water body / Protected Area for all relevant parameters to protect the drinking water quality.'No': no specific standards have been set in the surface water body / Protected Area to protect the drinking water quality. In this context, 'standards' mean specific quality objectives for pollutants for the protection of drinking water. Select 'No' if it is considered that other measures taken are sufficient to protect drinking water. Quality checks: Conditional check: Report if protectedAreaType is 'Article 7 Abstraction for drinking water'.</xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
</xs:element>
<xs:element name="protectedAreaDrinkingWaterObjectivesMet" type="wfd:YesNoNoInformation_Union_Enum" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="1">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation>Conditional. Indicate whether the specific standards set to protect drinking water quality in Article 7 Abstraction for Drinking Water Protected Areas are met: 'Yes': the specific standards set in the surface water body / Protected Area to protect the drinking water quality are met. 'No': the specific standards set in the surface water body / Protected Area to protect the drinking water quality are not met. 'No information' Quality checks: Conditional check: Report if protectedAreaType is 'Article 7 Abstraction for Drinking Water' AND protectedAreaDrinkingWaterObjectivesSet is 'Yes…'.</xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
</xs:element>
<xs:element name="protectedAreaShellfishObjectivesSet" type="wfd:ProtectedAreaShellfishObjective_Enum" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="1">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation>Conditional. Indicate whether microbiological standards have been set to protect shellfish by selecting the appropriate option from the enumeration list.Quality checks: Conditional check: Report if protectedAreaType is 'Shellfish'.</xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
</xs:element>
<xs:element name="protectedAreaShellfishObjectivesMet" type="wfd:YesNoNoInformation_Union_Enum" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="1">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation>Conditional. Indicate whether the microbiological standards set to protect shellfish in Shellfish Protected Areas are met: 'Yes': the microbiological standards set to protect shellfish are met. 'No': the microbiological standards set to protect shellfish are not met. 'No information' Quality checks: Conditional check: Report if protectedAreaType is 'Shellfish' AND protectedAreaShellfishObjectivesSet is either of the two 'Yes…' options.</xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
</xs:element>
<xs:element name="protectedAreaComment" type="wfd:String1000Type" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="1">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation>Optional. If objectives have not been set or standards have not been met for the Protected Area, provide further explanation (which objectives have not been set, which standards have not been met, reasons, etc). </xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
</xs:element>
<xs:element name="protectedAreaExemption" type="wfd:ExemptionType_Enum" minOccurs="1" maxOccurs="unbounded">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation>Required. Report which type(s) of exemption(s) from the relevant Protected Area objectives or standards apply at surface water body level, or 'No exemption'. More than one exemption may apply. Provide further details in the RBMP and/or background documents. For more information see Section 5.4.4 below. Quality checks: Conditional check: report for each euProtectedAreaCode reported if swAssociatedProtectedArea is 'Yes'. Within-schema check: the option 'No exemption' is not compatible with any other.</xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
</xs:element>
</xs:sequence>
</xs:complexType>
<xs:element name="SWB" type="SWB">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation>Chapter 2 Surface Water Bodies. One submission is required for each River Basin District.</xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
</xs:element>
<xs:complexType name="FailingRBSP">
<xs:sequence>
<xs:element name="swFailingRBSP" type="wfd:RBSP_Enum" minOccurs="1" maxOccurs="1">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation>Conditional. If the status or potential of QE 3-3 River Basin Specific Pollutants is less than good (as reported in class QualityElement, see below), indicate the CAS Number and name of the RBSP(s). The RBSPs selected from the enumeration list must be included in the methodology schema (SWMET/SWRBSP/rbsp) where details of all RBSPs’ good-moderate EQS are reported, i.e. the RBSPs reported in this element are those that are failing their associated good-moderate EQS in this surface water body. Quality checks: Conditional check: Report FailingRBSP if, in Class 'QualityElement', qeStatusOrPotentialValue='3' when qeCode='QE3-3 - River Basin Specific Pollutants'. Cross-schema check: The selected RBSPs must be consistent with the values reported in SWMET/SWRBSP/rbsp</xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
</xs:element>
<xs:element name="swFailingRBSPOther" type="wfd:String100Type" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="1">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation>Conditional. Report CAS number and name of the RBSP failing if not on the enumeration list under swFailingRBSP. Quality checks: Conditional check: report at least 1 if 'EEA_00-00-0 - Other chemical parameter' is chosen under 'swFailingRBSP'.</xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
</xs:element>
</xs:sequence>
</xs:complexType>
</xs:schema>
European Environment Agency
Kgs. Nytorv 6, DK-1050 Copenhagen K, Denmark